" Century Fox Post"

'The Internet World Newspaper'
.
........
.
____________________

EDITOR'S DESK

Marilyn Monroe Almost Naked

Candice Swanpoel's Hot Body

Sizzling Celebrities!

First Indian To Bare For Playboy

Joanna Krupa's Sexy Car Wash

Crazy Fans Of Euro 2012

Pamela Anderson's Style Evolution

Top Detox Foods

'Rosie Huntington' Bra Mania

Meet The Sexy Kate Upton!

HOUSE OF THE WEEK

Showing posts with label Manmohan Singh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manmohan Singh. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 October 2012

Cauvery Protests: Tamil Nadu To File Contempt Plea Against Karnataka

Chennai/New Delhi: The row between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu over the sharing of Cauvery water is set to escalate further on Wednesday, with the latter expected to file a contempt petition in the Supreme Court. 

The Jayalalithaa government yesterday decided to file a contempt petition “immediately” after the Karnataka government stopped the release of Cauvery water to Tamil Nadu. The Jayalalithaa government said Karnataka’s action amounted to impeding country’s federal structure. 

“In order to ensure that Tamil Nadu gets its due share of water, the Chief Minister has directed to file a contempt petition against Karnataka government which has unilaterally stopped releasing water, amounting to dishonouring the Supreme Court verdict,” an official release said after a meeting of Chief Minister Jayalalithaa with senior Cabinet colleagues and officials. 

DMK chief M Karunanidhi has, meanwhile, asked the Prime Minister to invoke Article 356 and impose Governor’s rule in the BJP-ruled Karnataka. 

Karnataka had on Monday night stopped release of water from the Krishna Raja Sagar Dam citing low storage in the reservoir, hours after Prime Minister Manmohan Singh made it clear that only the Cauvery River Authority (CRA) can review its order directing the state to release 9,000 cusecs to Tamil Nadu. 


Century Fox Report: Agitation will now turn violent say Cauvery Protestors.

The apex court had earlier endorsed the CRA ruling asking the upper riparian state to release 9000 cusecs from September 20-October 15, a decision contested by both states, locked in the decades-long Cauvery dispute. 

Karnataka has been requesting the CRA to stay its 19 September order asking the state to release 9,000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu daily till 15 October and keep it in abeyance till the decision was subjected to review. 

The Cauvery Monitoring Committee is expected to meet in Delhi on October 11 during which the reports of the two central study teams that visited both the states are likely to be debated.



EXPLORE:  World News       India        Manmohan Singh      Telangana March      Jan Satyagraha         Cauvery Protests 



Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Monday, 8 October 2012

Cauvery Protests: PM To Meet Karnataka Leaders

Cauvery water row: PM meets Karnataka leaders

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday will hear the Karnataka government’s petition seeking reconsideration of its September 28 directive to obey Prime Minister Manmohan Singh-led Cauvery River Authority’s order to release 9,000 cusecs of Cauvery water to Tamil Nadu. 

Intense protests over release of water to Tamil Nadu have been witnessed near Cauvery river basin areas.

The apex court had rapped the state for not obeying the September 19 order of the Prime Minister, who is the chairman of the Cauvery River Authority. 
In the meantime, leaders from Karnataka, including External Affairs Minister SM Krishna, Power Minister Veerappa Moily and BJP leader Ananth Kumar besides Water Resources Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal are meeting the Prime Minister in New Delhi for consultations on the contentious water dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. 

The consultations come ahead of the Cauvery monitoring committee meeting slated on October 11. The monitoring panel will decide release of water from Karnataka after October 15. 

Karnataka Chief Minister Jagadish Shettar on Sunday defended the state's decision to release Cauvery water to Tamil Nadu, saying it was "unavoidable" in the wake of the recent Supreme Court directive. 





EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh    Telangana March      Jan Satyagraha         Cauvery Protests


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Thursday, 27 September 2012

How Sonia Gandhi Was Persuaded To 'Back Reforms'


(Reuters) - It had been a brutal August for the Congress party: economic growth was wilting, the monsoon rains were failing and the opposition had it cornered on yet another corruption scandal.

In stepped Sonia Gandhi to revive the morale of the ruling party's lawmakers, exhorting them at a meeting to "stand up and fight, fight with a sense of purpose and fight aggressively". It was a stunningly assertive speech from the normally temperate matriarch of a dynasty that has ruled India for most of its post-independence era.

And yet few at the gathering were aware that just a week earlier she had performed an even more dramatic about-face, agreeing to a raft of economic reforms that would be unveiled on September 13 and 14.

Gandhi has no official government post, but as Congress party president and torchbearer of India's widely revered first family, she has the last word on big policy issues: and for her, social welfare has always come before liberalising the economy.

However, more than a dozen officials and party leaders close to the secretive inner circle of the Italian-born leader told Reuters that Gandhi was persuaded of the need for urgent action to avert a repeat of the crisis that took India to the brink of bankruptcy in 1991.

"This time there was a very grim scenario," said Rashid Kidwai, a Sonia Gandhi biographer who was given an account of the arguments made over weeks by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his new finance minister behind the closed doors of colonial-era government bungalows in New Delhi and even on a plane journey.

"It's not that she wanted to go for all this, but it was made very clear to her that, if she didn't, there would be far more dire consequences," Kidwai said.

Sources said the trigger for the reform campaign in Asia's third-largest economy came with the return of P. Chidambaram as finance minister on August 1.

An eloquent Harvard-educated technocrat with a track record as a reformer, he replaced Pranab Mukherjee, a left-of-centre Congress stalwart who had consistently warned Gandhi against radical reforms that could cost the party votes.

"Pranab was from the old school of Indian politics," said a senior government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "The prime minister and the finance minister had to persuade Mrs. Gandhi that good economics was good politics."

Her acquiescence in the end led to this month's "big bang Friday" when, a day after taking an axe to costly subsidies on diesel, the government announced that the retail market would be opened to foreign supermarket chains and the bar on foreign investment in both airlines and broadcasters would be lifted.

In sum, these were the most sweeping reforms since Singh took office in 2004 and - in the space of 48 hours - they dispelled the image of a prime minister who was losing his mojo as India's high-trajectory growth faltered.

A RELUCTANT REFORMER

However, insiders say Gandhi remains instinctively wary of economic liberalisation and trimming the budget deficit. For months, she had held out against cutting fuel subsidies that are aimed at the poor and the country's rural majority, fearing the impact on the Congress party's fortunes.

She only agreed when Singh and Chidambaram spelled out that new growth generated by reforms and improved investor sentiment would have a trickle-down effect and provide funds for welfare spending in time for elections due by mid-2014.

"They explained to Mrs. Gandhi that social benefits for the poor will need deep pockets," said a Congress party source who declined to be named because the discussions were confidential.

Reuters reviewed more than 30 letters written by Gandhi to the prime minister and U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks that portray her as passionate about social issues, and attached to protecting the poor.

That means the sudden burst of reforms could be cut short if Gandhi - who Forbes magazine ranks as the world's sixth most powerful woman - sees no benefits for the rural poor on whom her party relies for votes.

Indeed, party sources said she will now focus on passing a bill on universal food security in December, a populist plan that would cost billions of dollars at a time when her government is under intense pressure to rein in spending.

"She just wants enough budgetary resources available to finance her welfare schemes," said Swapan Dasgupta, a prominent journalist and commentator who leans towards the opposition.

"She has never spoken about reforms. What she has done is make Congress think of reforms as a low priority and a political liability - she has ingrained that mindset in the party."

A request to interview Gandhi was declined.

PARAMOUNT POWER

Sonia Gandhi, 65, carries the authority of a political family that, after India won independence from Britain in 1947, drove a vision of democratic socialism to uplift the vast rural masses. With that came a mind-boggling range of controls that tied the economy down and kept it closed to global markets.

A turning point came in 1991 when a slump in exports following the collapse of the Soviet Union and a leap in oil import costs due to the Gulf War tipped the country into a balance of payments crisis.

Manmohan Singh, then finance minister, responded with shock treatment, devaluing the rupee by nearly 19 percent. So determined was he to push this through, when the prime minister of the day got cold feet, he reportedly blamed the infamous inefficiency of India's telephone system to pretend that he couldn't contact the central bank in time.

His moves to prise open the economy set the stage for a long run of dazzling growth that peaked at 9.7 percent in 2006/07.

More News: Indian Government allows 51% FDI, triggering outrage in the country

Although Gandhi appointed Singh as prime minister when the Congress party returned to power eight years ago, she has a far more socialist mindset than the Oxford-educated economist who drove that first round of reforms.

Sources close to the Gandhi family say she has been strongly influenced by her late mother-in-law, former prime minister Indira Gandhi, whose policies were considerably left of centre.

Sonia Gandhi initially declined the throne of the Congress party after the 1991 assassination of her husband and former prime minister, Rajiv, but she finally agreed to enter politics six years later to lift the flagging fortunes of the party under her family's brand name.

As party president and chairperson of the ruling coalition, she has kept a low and almost enigmatic profile, appearing to stand above the political fray. When she went abroad for surgery last year there was no official word on her illness, and the media tamely accorded her the privacy a royal might expect.

But Gandhi wields extraordinary power behind the scenes, shaping policy out of the public eye with a tight circle of decision-makers and relying on back-channel negotiations to manage relations with fractious coalition allies

Ratings agency Standard & Poor's, warning earlier this year that India could become the first of the emerging market BRICS economies to lose its investment-grade rating, took a swipe at her resistance to policies mooted by Singh.

"The Congress party is divided on economic policies. There is substantial opposition within the party to any serious liberalisation of the economy," S&P said.

"Moreover, paramount political power rests with the leader of the Congress party, Sonia Gandhi, who holds no cabinet position, while the government is led by an unelected prime minister ... who lacks a political base of his own."

A BENEVOLENT MATRIARCH

Gandhi gives little away about her thinking on economic policy, but dispatches from the U.S. embassy in New Delhi during the early years of Singh's tenure show she made "repeated objections" to proposed hikes in fuel prices, which are heavily subsidised to cushion the poor.

"Key leaders (including Sonia Gandhi) have opposed the price hikes, criticised the way they have been handled, or urged Congress to capitulate to ... demands for a 'rollback', and the party is finding it difficult to speak with one voice," one of the cables said.

Describing a leader who projects herself as a benevolent matriarch, the dispatches were scathing about one of her pet projects, a scheme guaranteeing 100 days of paid employment per year for rural citizens. "At worst, the jobs plan is political patronage run amok and horrid economic policy," one said.

Gandhi also set up the National Advisory Council, a government-funded think tank that offers legislative guidance on social policy and the rights of disadvantaged groups.

A batch of letters Gandhi wrote as chairperson of the council, which were recently released under the Right to Information Act, illustrate where her priorities lie.

Writing to the prime minister and several ministers, she drew their attention to issues such as legal entitlement to subsidised foodgrains, child labour, housing for the poor and "indiscriminate acquisition" of agricultural land for private companies. In one letter, she closed by urging a minister: "You may like to have the matter examined appropriately".

WARNINGS OF IMPENDING CRISIS

How was Gandhi persuaded that, as one government official put it, "if you are not growing you are distributing poverty"?

For one thing, the economy was in trouble. Growth had dropped to its lowest clip in three years, the fiscal deficit was blowing past official targets, and the government was under heavy fire for sitting on its hands as the crisis mounted.

With Mukherjee gone from the Finance Ministry, Singh and Chidambaram made their move, warning Gandhi of a possible slump in the rupee and even a repeat of 1991, sources said.

"There were three meetings over about four weeks ... to tell her that if we don't do all this it will be bad politics," said the senior government official.

Singh also tackled Gandhi at length on the issue in July during a flight from Delhi to Assam.

Adding his voice at a separate meeting, Commerce Minister Anand Sharma explained to Gandhi t hat opening up to global supermarkets like Wal-Mart Stores Inc could tame the corruption that plagues the state-run food distribution network - a compelling argument after two years of graft scandals that have damaged her government.

When Gandhi returned in September from a medical check-up abroad, the stage was set for 'big bang Friday'.

And although the reforms triggered the walkout of key coalition partner Trinamool Congress (TMC) from the government, reducing it to a minority, she has resisted calls for a U-turn and even plans to join a street march in favour of the retail sector reform.

Gandhi's ambition in all this is to ensure that the Congress party returns to power in 2014, with her son - Rahul - at the helm of the government after eight years waiting in the wings.

"What she is concentrating on is really the need to be re-elected," said M.J. Akbar, a former Congress party lawmaker and once a trusted Gandhi family insider. "The only thing wrong about this reforms business though is ... they left it too close to the election.

EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh     Coalgate Scams         Pak     Indian President     Mumbai     Assam       26/11 Riots   2G Scam      Chidambaram         51% FDI              Mamata Banerjee     L.K Advani      Wal Mart     India, Pak Bilateral Ties


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Manmohan Singh, The FM or PM? (Video)



Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has many achievements to  his credit. Apart from being the Finance Minister who opened India’s economy and allowing foreign investment, he’s also the oldest serving Prime Minister at 80, holding together a coalition and still attempting to rescue the economy. But which role do people think he’s done better at?
“It is a clear case of who the public would support, is it Manmohan Singh, the Finance Minister or Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister? One wonders how the real hero of the 1991 reforms let us down so badly. I feel that he was too happy and complacent in office in his second term to take any major decision on any front,” Gurcharan Das, author and former CEO of P&G said in an interview with CNN-IBN.
On his 80th birthday, one wonders who is the real hero-Manmohan, the PM or FM?
Vinod Mehta, former Editor-in-Chief of Outlook magazine, who was also on the panel agreed with him.
Mehta pointed out that the Prime Minister was unwilling to use his power and did not assert himself.
“The reason the reform decisions did not materialise sooner was because Pranab Mukherjee (former Finance Minister) and Manmohan Singh did not see eye to eye,” he said.
But Mehta also noted that the Prime Minister was bold enough to go against domestic public opinion and was persistent on his policy on Pakistan. His early initiatives are the reason why Pakistan is keener than India to normalise relations now, he added.
EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh    CWC   Coalgate Scams         Pak     Indian President      26/11 Riots   2G Scam      Chidambaram        51% FDI          Mamata Banerjee     L.K Advani      Wal Mart       India, Pak Bilateral Ties



Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

CWC Endorses Economic Reforms Undertaken By Govt

With Mamata Banerjee walking out of UPA and the government facing opposition heat on economic reforms, Congress top brass met on Tuesday to take stock of the "present situation" and chalk out the strategy ahead. A meeting of the Congress Working Committee (CWC) chaired by Congress
Sonia Gandhi was expected to discuss on Tuesday morning the evolving political situation in the wake of Trinamool Congress severing ties with UPA and the government's determination to push ahead with reforms .

Century Fox Report: Congress walks out, Mamata Banerjee loses voice in WB assembly
The meeting also comes at a time when there is a clear realisation in Congress that the vexed issue of Telangana cannot be kept hanging for long. Indications have been given that a decision on the issue will be taken shortly.
A couple of days back, Andhra Pradesh Governor ESL Narasimhan had a meeting with Gandhi, home minister Sushilkumar Shinde and finance minister P Chidambaram, fuelling speculation that a decision may be on the cards. TRS chief K Chandrasekhara Rao is camping in the national capital for a meeting with Gandhi.
The CWC meeting took place in the backdrop of clear indications that Rahul Gandhi is going to assume a 'larger role' in party affairs very soon.
The timing of the meeting is crucial as it comes close on the heels of the opposition parties holding a nationwide bandh to oppose the government's decision on allowing 51% FDI in multi-brand retail, hiking prices of diesel and putting a cap on supply of subsidised LPG cylinders to households.
The meeting was also signficant as it is being held ahead of the crucial assembly elections in three states including Narendra Modi-run Gujarat.
AICC general secretary Janardan Dwivedi, however, refused to specify what are issues that will be discussed in Tuesday's meeting.
"It will discuss the present situation" was his only refrain when asked about the issues that are expected to come up for deliberations in CWC.
Despite the 19-member Trinamool Congress walking out of UPA, Congress is not worried over the numbers as both Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party have continued to back the government.
Opposition NDA has also said that it is not pushing for the ouster of the government, maintaining that it will not take steps in that direction as it may fall due to its internal contradictions.
However, the worry for the government is that some of its allies do not agree with recent decisions. DMK had joined the nationwide bandh on September 20 against the government's decisions.
Even within Congress, there have been voices of disagreement.
While a special invitee to CWC Anil Shastri has openly opposed the decisions saying they have damaged the party, some leaders speaking on the condition of anonymity said that the government could have moved a bit more cautiously on the measures.
The meeting will be attended by permanent members of CWC as well as its permanent invitees.
EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh   Coalgate Scams         2G Scam   
        Odisha Bandh        Mining Companies   Narendra Modi         Kudankulam         Suresh Kalmadi        IOA       51% FDI             Mamata Banerjee     L.K Advani      Wal Mart



Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Sunday, 23 September 2012

LK Advani Slams PM For ‘Red-Carpet’ To Wal-Mart



BJP leader LK Advani on Sunday slammed prime minister Manmohan Singh over the issue of allowing FDI in multi-brand retail and said the red carpet was being rolled out for Wal-Mart when it faced protests even in the US.
He also said the BJP had opposed the measure when the NDA was in power.
In his latest blog, the BJP leader referred to the reported unrest brewing against America’s largest retailer Wal-Mart in various US cities at a time when the government here is “rolling out the red carpet” for it.
Quoting an article of author and financial expert S Gurumurthy, he said that on September 14 when Manmohan Singh rolled out the red carpet for Wal-Mart, the same day “New York City shut Wal-Mart out”.
He also referred to a web-based newspaper that carried a story on how Wal-Mart displaced nearby small businesses the day FDI in retail was notified in India last week.
“Weeks ago, on June 30, over 10,000 people, shouting ‘Wal-Mart = Poverty’, marched through Los Angeles against Wal-Mart stores,” Advani said quoting Gurumurthy.
He also quoted a New York Times report on how Mexico has become the second largest country for Wal-Mart after the US in terms of number of stores.
“According to a New York Times report, this has been achieved by the retail giant’s Mexico arm by dishing out generous payouts to aid its mammoth growth,” he said.
Advani said that shortly after the Times published its investigation in April, 2012, Wal-Mart confirmed that it had launched an investigation into the “allegations of bribery at Wal-Mart de Mexico”.
Advani also recalled an exchange between Congress leader Priyaranjan Dasmunshi and the then industry and commerce minister Arun Shourie in the Lok Sabha on December 16, 2002.
Munshi, citing an Economic Times article, had raised the issue that the NDA government was being pressured to open up FDI in retail. Shourie said that since 1997 the policy had been to not allow FDI in retail. Advani infers that there has been opposition to FDI in retail even in the Congress party and he quotes Munshi as saying in that exchange, “...multinational retailers are continuously putting pressure on the government to take this anti-national decision of allowing foreign direct investment in the retail trade.
EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh   Coalgate Scams        2G Scam      Chidambaram         Bal Thackeray     True Depth Of Coalgate Scam      Odisha Bandh        Mining Companies       Narendra Modi         Kudankulam      51% FDI         Mamata Banerjee


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Bharat Bandh On 20th Sept, To Protest Against Diesel Price Hike


New Delhi: BJP-led NDA will hold a country-wide protest on September 20 protesting against the central government's decision to hike the diesel price and allow FDI in multi-brand retail.
Announcing the alliance's decision here, BJP leader L K Advani said, "NDA on Sep 15 decided to hold a nation-wide strike on 20th of this month. I am sure that the suffocation felt by the people for a long time is about to come to an end."
Addressing the press with Sushma Swaraj and other senior leaders of the coalition he said "it would be prudent and wise for the government itself to decide that they do not wait till 2014 for the people to give their opinion about the UPA government. Let them call for an early election. Let the people make a decision."
Stating that the government should be allowed to rethink over all its acts, the BJP leader said "if they are able to do that on their own by giving resignation-- the Lok Sabha elections are also due shortly-- I think it will be fine."
He said no political party's consent was taken by the government before making these announcements. "They have not consulted any political party and Chief Minister and have announced this suddenly. This is something which the country is not going to take lying down," Advani said.
 He said NDA leaders have talked "informally" to other political parties and "I think the 20th September strike will be spontaneous and successful". "This is the betrayal of Parliament, people and thousands of traders in the country," Advani alleged.
EXPLORE:  World News     India    Manmohan Singh   Coalgate Scams        
     2G Scam      Chidambaram         Bal Thackeray     True Depth Of Coalgate Scam        Aseem Trivedi            Odisha Bandh        Mining Companies
Narendra Modi         Kudankulam           51% FDI    


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Congress Learns To Admire Manmohan Singh


For anyone other than the Nehru-Gandhis to win and command the respect and admiration of the Congress party members is an impossible thing. Even Pranab Mukherjee, the man for all crises, was disliked intensely by a large section of the party workers and activists. The attitude of the party towards prime minister Manmohan Singh is quite different. No one ever saw him as part of the Congress family. He remained an outsider, a useful techno-bureaucrat who is needed to find solutions to policy challenges.
 But he has never been considered a pillar of the party, something that P Chidambaram, Digvijay Singh, AK Antony enjoy. Singh has turned the status of a political cipher into an advantage. He has fought the political battle for his space in the party not on the basis of secularism, socialism and all those favoured and jaded Congress shibboleths, but on technical, economic issues.
In 2008, he turned the India-US civil nuclear deal as the battle-point. Seasoned politicians and political aficionados laughed at his naivete. But Singh turned it into a successful political issue in the 2009 Lok Sabha election. There were no immediate economic benefits to be had from the prospect of nuclear power. It will be 20 years before generation of electricity through nuclear power will become a critical factor in the Indian energy scenario.
Congressmen and Congresswomen are used to the mystical charisma factor of the First Family, but they do not understand the phenomenon of politics being played on the basis of development and performance which has nothing to do with welfare measures. Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit has shown that performance matters, but then, Delhi is much too small a political theatre. Manmohan Singh is staking his claims of performance and development and of taking the economy forward on the national stage.

Singh is doing something better than P V Narasimha Rao. He has kept away from party feud, while Rao engaged in it with the relish of a grassroots politician, and in the end he was politically destroyed by his rivals and opponents in the party. He is playing the outsider to the hilt. It has been said time and again, both by party insiders and party watchers, that the unforgivable political crime that Rao committed was the attempt to destroy the Nehru-Gandhi roots in the party. There is as yet no hard evidence to show that this was so, except through hearsay.
It seems that Singh is showing the Congress without challenging the authority of the Nehru-Gandhis that what a party needs is hard thinking on policy issues and its implementation. And that he is the man for the task. Of course, he faces the risk of failure and the consequent political decapitation.
Singh has been helped greatly by the atavistic NGOs who are arguing against nuclear power as well as FDI in multi-brand retail. The BJP, the main opposition party, has been gunning for Singh in the two major scams — 2G spectrum allocation and coal block allocation — but it had displayed a fatalistic Swadeshi Jagran Manch mind-set in opposing nuclear power and FDI in retail. Faced with the BJP onslaught, the Congress had to rally round Singh and the government.
Without intending to do so, Singh provoked opposition offensive which called for a Congress response and he became the hero of the battle. The BJP took pot shots at Congress president Sonia Gandhi and party general secretary Rahul Gandhi, but their main target is Singh. As a matter of fact, BJP is playing a sly political game suggesting that it is time Rahul Gandhi stepped forward because it would be easier to attack him than Singh.
A young BJP leader suggested that Rahul Gandhi should not just join as a cabinet minister because after 2014, he will just be a former minister. But if he were to become the prime minister, then post-2014 he can enjoy the status of former prime minister. Singh’s critics had always mocked him that he was a better politician than an economist, and their criticism is turning out to be true much to the consternation of the opposition.
Singh, the political warrior, may not emerge a victor in the 2014 electoral battle. But his war cry, “Let us go down fighting” could turn out to be prophetic and even heroic. The Congress has at last found a leader who is capable of leading the party and the government through thick sniper fire and they seem to be grateful for it. Singh’s bravado on policy front is unlikely to negate the general perception that corruption has really eaten into the UPA government as it had the Rao government through 1991-1996.
But Singh can take satisfaction that he has kept the party in power for a decade and that he has done his bit. And unlike in the case of Rao, Singh will enjoy the gratitude of Congress. There are lessons here for other Congress leaders if they mean to lead the party and the country. They must come forward with ideas, look meek and unambitious, press forward with policy issues with fanatical ferocity and not play small games inside the party. Congress has shown that it does not grudge leaders who use brains to push economic doctrines as Singh does.
EXPLORE:  World News     India      Coalgate Scams           Indian President    
    2G Scam      Chidambaram         Bal Thackeray     True Depth Of Coalgate Scam        Aseem Trivedi            Odisha Bandh        Mining Companies             Narendra Modi         Kudankulam              51% FDI       


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Saturday, 15 September 2012

Indian Government Allows 51% FDI, Triggering Outrage In The Country



Ending months of perceived policy paralysis, the UPA government Friday finally bit the bullet and pushed ahead with the boldest reforms yet by allowing 51% foreign investment in multi-brand retail - and opening the aviation sector - triggering expected outrage among some of its allies as well as the opposition.

The government clarified that states which did not favour 51 percent FDI in multi-brand retail - which opens up India's estimated $450 billion retail market to foreign supermarkets like Walmart and Carrefour - were free to not implement the policy.
This effectively means that states ruled by Congress governments can implement the decision while states ruled by non-Congress parties or the central government's allies will not have to implement it
The move comes at a time when the government's reputation has been battered by a host of alleged scams and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's reputation as a reformer has taken a dent, with a leading US daily portraying him as "a tragic figure" and Time magazine describing him as "an underachiever".
Manmohan Singh was the prime mover behind this audacious but politically fraught decision.
Informed sources said he reportedly pushed for the decision at the meeting of the cabinet committee on economic affairs (CCEA), saying the UPA government needs to "bite the bullet".
"We have to bite the bullet. If we  have to go down, let us go down fighting," the prime minister was quoted by the sources as having said there.http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2012/9/15_09_pg1b.jpg
The government also approved FDI in aviation and gave its nod for disinvestment in four PSUs, part of a package of reformist measures, along with the steep hike in diesel prices announced Thursday, which are widely seen as aimed at shoring up the faltering economy and the international standing of India that has taken a severe beating in recent months.
Soon after the decisions were made known, the prime minister appealed to the people to support the government's steps that were "taken in national interest."
"I urge all segments of public opinion to support the steps we have taken in national interest," the PMO's Twitter handle quoted him as saying. "I believe that these steps will help  strengthen our growth process and generate employment in these difficult times."
The decision could potentially be a game-changer for India's retail market, which is dominated by neighbourhood stores.
While industry bodies welcomed the  move, ally Trinamool Congress joined the angry chorus of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Left to denounce the move, which the government insisted  would not hurt India's national interests.
BJP and Communist leaders called the  decision a "betrayal" of the people's interests.
"This is a complete betrayal, also of  parliament," BJP MP Balbir Punj said. Communist Party of India's D. Raja said a corruption-tainted regime was trying to salvage its image.

West Bengal Chief Minister and Trinamool Congress Mamata Banerjee was furious and said she would not stand for it.
According to Trinamool MP Kunal Ghosh, the party's parliamentary board will meet Tuesday to take a final decision, which could even lead to withdrawal of support from the government. "All options are open. We are ready  to take any kind of strong decision," he said.

DMK president M.Karunanidhi also said his party has opposed FDI in retail as it would result in competition for small traders. 
The BJP, whose opposition to the coal block allocations paralyzed parliament's monsoon session, vowed to unleash nationwide protests against the FDI unveiling.
Attacking the central government's decisions allowing overseas investments in multi-brand retail and raising diesel price by Rs. 5 a litre, the CPI-M too said it, along with other secular parties, will launch a nationwide stir against the measures.
As criticism mounted, Commerce Minister Anand Sharma defended the sweeping policy changes, viewed as a major  step to spur economic reforms.
"It is not a sudden decision," Sharma told the media, explaining the decisions taken Friday.
The cabinet also decided that overseas retailers setting up a single brand store in India must source at least 30 percent of their goods from Indian companies, preferably from micro, small  and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Earlier it was mandatory for the overseas firms to source 30 percent of the goods from MSMEs.
The minister said the decision was first taken last November but subsequently held back following opposition mainly from the Left, BJP and the Trinamool.
But it was "never rolled back", Sharma clarified.
He said since then the government had held intense discussions with various stakeholders with a view to creating broad consensus. He said among those who were spoken to were farmers associations, civil society groups, regional chambers of commerce and industry as well as state governments.
"I had personally written to every chief minister of the country, spoken to almost all of them. There are states  which reacted to the proposal very well, some expressed opposition. The response has been a mixed one."
According to the government, the move comes with some conditions for the investors.
Sharma said multi-brand FDI was expected to generate a large number of jobs in rural India besides giving remunerative prices to farmers for their products.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/Popup/2012/9/15_09_pg1a.jpg

EXPLORE:  World News         India           Coalgate Scams            Indian President       2G Scam        Chidambaram        Bal Thackeray         True Depth Of Coalgate Scam        Aseem Trivedi            Odisha Bandh        Mining Companies
Narendra Modi         Kudankulam  


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Friday, 14 September 2012

Government Cancels Allocation Of 4 Captive Coal Blocks



Sending a strong message that miners would not be allowed to sit on the country’s precious mineral reserves, the government on Thursday cancelled the allocation of four captive coal blocks held by three companies. The inter-ministerial group (IMG) on coal had recommended the cancellation of these blocks after four rounds of review of their progress.


“The recommendations have been accepted by the government,” an official release said. The acreages that were axed include Bramhadih block allocated to Castron Mining, Chinora and Warora (Southern Part) blocks allocated to Fieldmining and Ispat and Lalgarh (North) block allotted to DOMCO Smokeless Fuels.

While this is not the first time block allocations  have been cancelled — the government has so far cancelled 23 of the 195 allocated blocks — the development assumes significance as it comes in the wake of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG)’s observations questioning the method of allocation and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) enquiry into the multi-crore coal scam.



BLOCKS IN THE DOCK
Companies whose coal blocks may be deallocated
CASTRON MINING
Bramhadih block, Jharkhand
FIELD MINING & ISPAT
Chinora & Warora Southern blocks, Maharashtra
DOMCO SMOKELESS FUELS Lalgarh North block, Jharkhand

IMG, headed by Zohra Chatterji, additional secretary in the coal ministry, had also recommended deduction of bank guarantee in the cases of three blocks — Marki Mangli-II, III and IV — allocated to Shri Virangana Steels. Also, Monnet Ispat and Energy, developing the Utkal B2 block, was asked to submit bank guarantee equalling three years of royalty, failing which it stands to face de-allocation.

Century Fox Report: True depth of Coalgate Scam

Monnet Ispat refused to comment, saying the company had yet to receive any formal communication from the ministry.
IMG is reviewing a total of 58 blocks that were issued showcause notices earlier this year. The panel completed the review of 29 of these blocks held by private companies in three meetings on September 6, 7 and 8. In its fourth meeting on Wednesday, the group summed up its findings on eight blocks, on the basis of justifications for delay forwarded by miners, and the coal controller’s block status report. Allocations for four of these eight blocks have been cancelled.

IMG’s meeting came amid reports of doubts raised by various government departments on the authority of the panel to recommend cancellation of allocations. The panel has representation of the power, finance and the environment ministries, besides coal ministry officials. The Opposition Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) has also accused the government of willingly delaying the review process for de-allocation.

IMG is scheduled to again meet on Friday. Coal minister Sriprakash Jaiswal said he expected the panel to submit its report by Monday.

EXPLORE:  World News          India           Coalgate Scams          2G Scam      Chidambaram             Bal Thackeray          True Depth Of Coalgate Scam             Mining Companies              Narendra Modi     


Edited By Cen Fox Post Team

Hot Babes In Bikinis

"Foxy Megan"

Focus On Terrorism!

Who Won Round 2?

Students March In Madrid

'Today' Shows Staffers Split

Addicted To Exercise!